不同手术方式治疗慢性肛裂疗效评价的网状Meta分析

目的评价不同手术方式治疗慢性肛裂的效果。 方法通过计算机检索传统肛裂切除术、纵切横缝法、改良纵切横缝术、肛裂切除术+外括约肌切开术、肛裂切除术+内括约肌切开术5种手术治疗慢性肛裂的国内外临床研究，采用Stata13及GeMTC软件对其治愈率和并发症发生率进行传统Meta分析和网状Meta分析。 结果共纳入21项临床研究2 430例患者。网状Meta分析显示肛裂切除术+内括约肌切开术和肛裂切除术+外括约肌切开术的治愈率均高于传统肛裂切除术，OR值分别为2.27（95%CI=1.14~4.36）、3.26（95%CI=1.67~6.75）。在并发症的发生率方面，纵切横缝术、传统肛裂切除术排前两位，肛裂切除术+内括约肌切开术最低。 结论在5种常见的慢性肛裂手术方式中，肛裂切除术+内括约肌切开术的疗效和并发症发生均优于传统肛裂切除术、纵切横缝法、改良纵切横缝术、肛裂切除术+外括约肌切开术。     

两种术式对于胆道结石患者术后胆道压力与胃肠道功能研究

目的探讨微创手术和开腹手术治疗胆道结石患者的临床疗效及对胆道压力和胃肠道功能的影响，分析胆道压力与胃肠功能的相互关系。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年1月收治的124例胆道结石患者。开腹组60例患者采用开腹手术治疗，微创组64例患者采用腹腔镜下胆道镜内镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗。采用SPSS18.00统计软件分析，术中术后指标、炎性因子检测、术后胆道压测定和胃肠动力指标检测，以均数( ±s)形式录入，采用独立t检验；净石率、术后并发症比较采用χ²检验；胆道压力与胃肠动力指标相关性分析采用Spearman相关分析，以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。 结果微创组手术时间、住院天数、住院费用、净石率、并发症率均优于开腹组(P<0.05)；微创组术后3 d、 5 d血清IL－6、 IL－8、 TNF－α浓度、 MTL、 CCK、 VIP水平和胆道压力和均显著低于开腹组(P<0.05)；患者术后胆道压力与胃肠动力指标MTL、 CCK程负相关(r＝－0.632, －0.678; P均<0.05)；VIP水平与胆道压力程正相关(r＝0.712; P<0.05)。 结论腹腔镜下胆道镜内镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗胆道结石临床效果明显，术后机体炎症反、胆道压力、胃肠动力指标更优，且胆道压力与胃肠动力指标具有一定相关性。     

腹腔镜扩大左半肝联合全尾叶切除术

1．肝门处预置肝门阻断带，必要时行肝门阻断控制出血；2.肝脏肿瘤压迫第一、二、三肝门及下腔静脉，紧贴肿瘤包膜处理各管道，采取左右结合、由浅入深的策略；3.优先离断肝实质，劈肝后分离出左侧肝蒂，以直线切割闭合器离断左侧肝蒂；4.肝实质内紧贴包块包膜离断肝实质；5.肝脏包块侵犯肝中静脉及右侧尾状叶，术中联合肝中静脉及全尾叶切除；6.术中避免损伤右侧肝蒂及右肝静脉；7.术中使用超声刀、Ligasure等能量器械断肝、止血；8.缝合技术在腹腔镜肝切除手术中具有重要作用。     

Fístulas posquirúrgicas de líquido cefalorraquídeo tras cirugía transesfenoidal de adenomas hipofisarios: análisis de una serie de 302 intervenciones

IntroductionTranssphenoidal surgical removal is the preferred treatment of most pituitary adenomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is the leading cause of morbidity after this procedure, with an incidence rate that varies from 0,5-15% in the main published series.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to establish the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage in a sample of surgeries performed at the University Hospital of La Ribera by the same surgical team. The secondary objectives were to: ascertain the distinctive features between patients with and without postoperative CSF leakage, identify risk factors for their development, evaluate the relationship between the surgical technique for closing the sella turcica and the onset of postoperative CSF leakage and evaluate different treatment regimens for this complication.MethodsThe data of 302 consecutive transsphenoidal surgical procedures for pituitary adenoma removal which were performed between 1999 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.Results and conclusionsThe incidence of postoperative CSF leakage in our series was 2,3% (in accordance with similar published studies). It was possible to correlate intraoperative CSF leakage with two variables: pituitary macroadenoma and tumors with suprasellar extension (P < .005). This correlation did not exist for postoperative CSF leakage. We found a statistically significant correlation between intraoperative and postoperative CSF leakage (P < .005). Due to the low incidence of postoperative CSF leakage in our series, it was not possible to identify risk factors for its development.     

新型胸骨环抱器结合钢丝固定胸骨的临床效果

目的探讨新型胸骨环抱器结合钢丝固定胸骨在成人心脏正中切口直视手术中的应用效果。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年12月期间在临沂市人民医院心脏血管外科接受手术治疗的328例心脏大血管疾病患者临床资料，按胸骨固定方法不同分为对照组159例和研究组169例。其中对照组采用传统的钢丝将锯开的胸骨左右两侧缝合，后收紧钢丝、合拢胸骨并拧紧钢丝，予以固定胸骨；研究组采用钢丝对合锯开胸骨的基础上放置新型环抱器固定胸骨。分析2组患者关胸时间(关胸开始到皮肤切口缝合结束的时间)、二次开胸止血(胸骨相关)率、术后24 h引流量、术后切口、胸骨感染或胸骨裂开率、术后胸痛不适发生率以及术后住院时间。患者出院后通过门诊、电话询问进行随访。数据比较采用t检验和χ²检验。 结果关胸术后，对照组1例患者因急性A型主动脉夹层术后急性肾功能衰竭死亡，其余所有患者均痊愈出院。研究组患者关胸时间(32.3±7.3) min，明显少于对照组(51.5±8.4) min，差异有统计学意义(t＝－22.113，P<0.05)。胸骨相关的二次开胸止血，研究组发生1例，而对照组发生6例，2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ²＝3.969，P＝0.046)。研究组术后24 h引流量(372.8±213.1) mL，少于对照组(538.9±202.6) mL，2组比较差异有统计学意义(t＝－7.224，P<0.05)。研究组术后未见切口和胸骨感染和(或)裂开，而对照组感染和(或)裂开共7例，其中胸骨裂开4例，早期予以新型环抱器重新固定胸骨，治愈出院；切口感染2例，予以换药后重新缝合切口后治愈；胸骨感染1例，予以胸骨清创加胸大肌肌瓣转移手术后康复出院，2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ²＝7.599，P<0.05)。研究组术后出现胸痛不适2例，而对照组7例，2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ²＝4.101，P＝0.043)。研究组患者术后住院时间(8.6±4.1) d，少于对照组(10.5±3.4) d，2组比较差异有统计学意义(t＝－4.467，P<0.05)。患者出院后随访(11.3±4.9)个月，所有患者均未见胸骨感染及裂开。 结论新型胸骨环抱器结合钢丝固定胸骨手术切口，与传统手术相比操作简单、固定牢固，在缩短关胸手术时间、减少术后切口并发症、缩短住院时间等方面优势明显，可以广泛使用于成人心脏外科正中手术切口。     

Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing

In the present study, 67 individuals from two families were analyzed to explore the efficacy of the ForenSeq^™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for pairwise kinship analysis. Six types of pairwise relationships including 81 parent-offspring, 60 full siblings, 48 grandparent-grandchildren, 147 uncle/aunt-nephew/nieces, 97 first cousins and 190 non-relatives were generated from these two families and the corresponding likelihood ratio (LR) was calculated using either sequence-based or length-based STR genotype data (i.e., LR_sequence and LR_length). In addition, 10,000 pairs of different relationships were simulated to estimate the system powers of the STRs and SNPs in this panel. The results showed that 54, 9 and 5 additional alleles were observed based on sequence for 27 autosomal STRs, 24 Y-STRs and 7 X-STRs, respectively, compared to those based on length information and 11 novel alleles were identified. Five mutations were found for 58 STRs in 81 parent-offspring but no mutations were observed for SNPs. For 27 autosomal STR loci, the LRs were increased from 9.20, 7.87, 2.01, 2.07, 0.42 for log₁₀LR_length to 11.52, 10.12, 2.61, 2.60, 0.52 for log₁₀LR_sequence for paternity index (PI), full siblings index (FSI), grandparent-grandchild index (GI), uncle/aunt-nephew/niece index (UNI) and first cousins index (FCI), respectively. PI values for 94 SNPs separated more than those of 27 STRs if two individuals were non parent-offspring relatives. For the simulation study, the effectiveness was 1 for the parent-offspring relationship at the thresholds of t₁ = − 4 and t₂ = 4 and was 0.9998 for full siblings (t₁ = − 2, t₂ = 2). With an error rate of 0.42%, 93.02% of second degree relatives could be identified at the thresholds of t₁ = − 1 and t₂ = 1. However, the effectiveness was only 0.4300 for first cousins with a relatively high error rate of 2.68% (t₁ = − 1, t₂ = 1). In conclusion, STR typing according to the sequence information is more polymorphic, which increases the discrimination power for kinship testing. Compared to these 27 STR markers, 94 SNP markers in this panel have advantages in paternity testing especially when mutated STRs are involved or when a relative is an alleged parent. This panel is powerful enough to resolve paternity and full sibling testing. Most of the second degree relationships could be identified with low error rate while more markers are still needed for first cousins testing.